webleads-tracker

Pharma Compliance Info Justifying conflicts of interest in medical journals: a very bad idea Global

Justifying conflicts of interest in medical journals: a very bad idea

A series of articles in the New England Journal of Medicine has questioned whether the conflict of interest movement has gone too far in its campaign to stop the drug industry influencing the medical profession.
Here, three former senior NEJM editors respond with dismay : Robert Steinbrook, professor adjunct of internal medicine, Jerome P Kassirer, distinguished professor, Marcia Angell, senior lecturer on social medicine.
A seriously flawed and inflammatory attack on conflict of interest policies and regulations appeared recently in a most unexpected location: the venerable and trusted New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). In a series of rambling articles, one of the journal’s national correspondents, Lisa Rosenbaum, supported by the editor in chief, Jeffrey Drazen, tried to rationalise financial conflicts of interest in the medical profession.1 2 3 4 As former senior editors of the NEJM, we find it sad that the medical journal that first called attention to the problem of financial conflicts of interest among physicians would now backtrack so dramatically and indulge in personal attacks on those who disagree.
To read this article in the BMJ

Check Also

Pharma Compliance Info Canada | More Transparency In Health Care: Ontario's Proposed "Sunshine" Legislation Global

Canada | More Transparency In Health Care: Ontario’s Proposed “Sunshine” Legislation

The Ontario Government introduced a bill on September 27 to enact legislation aimed at strengthening …

X